FALL FY 18 PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT
Note to prospective applicants: Please read this announcement carefully and thoroughly. Aspects of eligibility, strategic technology sectors and application process have changed, significantly. Applicants not adhering to the new process will have their proposals disqualified. Applicants wishing to re-submit proposals to TAP must comply with the revised procedures.
UTAH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH (USTAR) INITIATIVE
USTAR is the State of Utah’s technology catalyst, accelerating the growth of the innovation ecosystem from invention through product development. Guided by Utah’s economic clusters, USTAR supports technology entrepreneurs and innovators through training, funding and incubator and accelerator programs; brokering technology transfer by connecting capital, management and industry, addressing market gaps in Utah’s technology ecosystem and strengthening the state’s research capacity.
TECHNOLOGY ACCELERATION PROGRAM (TAP)
The Technology Acceleration Program (TAP) is a USTAR competitive grant program that supports private sector technology development for Utah-based companies. Proposed work can include, but is not limited to, research and development, proof of concept, product validation, and product development. TAP grants must be used to accelerate the development and commercialization of a technology and project proposals must identify specific technical milestones leading to the proposed outcome.
In addition to the award, TAP awardees will receive non-material support, such as referral to USTAR’s partner networks, to assist in achieving technical and business milestones with the goal of commercial success.
- Company must be Utah-based. To be considered Utah-based, a company must:
- Be registered with the Utah Division of Corporations as an active for-profit business entity in good standing
- Maintain at least 90% of employees in Utah. A waiver may be requested for 50-90% employees residing in the state after award decisions.
- Companies must have fewer than 50 employees and have raised less than $5MM in private funding and have less than $1MM annual revenue.
- TAP proposals should align with the targeted industry sectors identified by the USTAR Governing Authority (see below)
- Applicants may not submit a TAP proposal if current TAP or UTAG grant milestones will not be completed by the application deadline.
- Proposed technology milestones for TAP funds must be at an initial technology readiness level (TRL) of 3-5. Milestone outcomes cannot exceed TRL 6. For information regarding TRLs, visit Technology Readiness Levels.
- Misrepresentation of TRLs in order to apply for TCIP (TRL 6 and above) and TAP (TRL 3-5) simultaneously will result in immediate disqualification.
- Company must have secured, or be in the process of securing relevant license(s) to IP required for project.
TARGETED TECHNOLOGY SECTORS
USTAR is focused on the following targeted technology industry sectors for FY18 (July 1-June 30):
Automation and Robotics (including IoT and Smart City technologies) – Automation technology is the use of cutting-edge machinery in industrial applications to minimize human exertion. Robotics is the branch of automation that deals with the design, construction, operation and application of robots, as well as computer systems for their control, sensory feedback and information processing.
Aerospace – Aerospace is concerned with aeronautics and astronautics. Areas for research include, but are not limited to, innovative approaches in aerodynamics, advanced materials, engineering of aircraft and spacecraft and the autonomous control of aircraft. This includes both manned and unmanned systems.
Big Data and Cybersystems – Big data is a term for data sets that are so large or complex that traditional data processing applications are inadequate. Challenges include analysis, capture, data curation, search, sharing, storage, transfer, visualization, querying and information privacy. Analysis of data sets can find new relationships to gather information on topics such as business trends, crime patterns, genome sequences, complex physical environments and more. Cybersystems is an overarching term related to computerized electrical and mechanical processes, as well as information generation and large capacity, rapid access storage, as well as data encryption, data security against breaches and data retrieval technologies. USTAR wishes to inspire creation and development of new strategies to prevent attacks on computer system networks and develop new encryption tools and computer hardware with a line of sight toward the next generation of computer hardware. Development of Software as a Service (SaaS) and healthcare IT products are not considered in scope for this funding mechanism.
Energy and Clean Technology – Energy and clean technology encompasses products and processes that harness renewable and nonrenewable advanced materials to dramatically reduce the use of natural resources, cut emissions and waste, and provide options for efficient energy storage and usage.
Life Sciences – Life science is defined as the study of living organisms from a cellular, molecular, or macroscopic perspective. Research in this area includes, but is not limited to advanced materials applicable to devices and drug delivery, medical device development, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, agriculture, and genetics.
Stage 1. Mandatory Letter of Intent (LOI) that includes the following:
- Proposal title, technical contact name and contact information
- State the technology sector
- Brief description of technology, unmet need, project deliverables (500 words maximum)
- TRL and justification (300 words maximum)
- Brief description of team member’s role and responsibilities (250 words maximum)
- Estimated total budget request
- GRAMA disclosure (downloadable form)
- W9 form (downloadable form)
- Quad chart – a downloadable form summarizing key elements of the technology and commercial positioning
- Submit the LOI by August 25th 2017, 5:00 p.m. MST. A letter of intent is required to submit a full proposal. Failure to submit a letter of intent by the due date will disqualify your application. Send letter of intent to TAPinfo@Utah.gov.
Stage 2. Complete Applications will be accepted electronically at taputah.com. Applicants will be required to create a profile and agree to all terms and conditions for the program. The website accepting online applications is optimized for the Google Chrome browser. It is suggested that applicants refer to the provided checklist to ensure submission of a complete application, including the GRAMA disclosure, W9, all subsections of the white paper and scope of work, budget and budget narrative, key personnel biosketches, and letters of support. All submitted documents must be in PDF form.
Applications are due October 2, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. MST.
- Budget and Budget Narrative: Downloadable forms
- Identify any private or government funds raised to date or pending. Include the source of funds and total amount raised. Describe potential matching funds. If USTAR funds have been used to date, please specify the date awarded and amount.
Travel outside of Utah must not only be necessary for milestone completion, but must also carry justification as to why the activity cannot take place in the state, and why the said destination is such. If work will be conducted outside the state of Utah, document the rationale and the portion of budget that will be used outside of Utah.
Any required equipment in the budget that exceeds $5,000 will require justification.
- Key Personnel Biosketch: Use one form for each key person not to exceed 5 pages per Biosketch.
- Describe background and experience that will lead to milestone accomplishment
- Provide technical and management contribution to the project
- White Paper (Project Narrative) must not be more than six pages, 1.5 spacing and no less than 12-point Arial font with one inch margins. The white paper must be presented in NON-CONFIDENTIAL terms and must include the following:
- Introduction: Describe the overall technology background, problem being solved in terms of unmet need, innovation (disruptive-transformational-incremental improvement over state-of-the-art), rationale and overall approach based on current technology development level, TR, expected TRL at project completion.
- Technical Strategy: For each project milestone describe the technical approach, the expected outcome(s) and specific deliverable(s). Include limitations and alternative approaches. A statement of the timeline for completion should be included. All project must be completed within 12-18 months.
- Commercial Market Strategy: Using non-confidential language, describe the business model and commercialization strategies of the company. Briefly describe the intended market, competitors, innovation in your product that will allow it to compete in the market, as well as market size and realistic revenue stream if company is successful. Related to the commercialization plan, address the path to market, regulatory path (if applicable), additional resources required and how they will be acquired.
- Economic Impact: Characterize the potential economic impact on the state of Utah if your company is successful in taking the technology to market. This can include job creation, product sales and potential revenue. The economic impact description should also include anticipated time to market. Indicate if resources, such as manufacturing or supplies, will be sourced within Utah.
- Governance: Describe the governance structure of your business
- Scope of Work – This is a breakdown of the project by milestone. Use the provided template to present your research plan according to milestones, their corresponding deliverable(s), budget and timeline. Use the chart template to illustrate milestone activity relative to the total grant period.
- Letters of Support – USTAR encourages submission of supporting letters from individuals not holding positions in the company. No more than 3 letters are permitted, each less than 5 pages.
Stage 3. USTAR reserves the right to invite selected applicants to give a brief presentation to a review panel. A presentation template will be provided in that instance.
STATE FISCAL YEAR
The state’s fiscal year is July 1 – June 30. Please use Fiscal Year designation (FY18) in developing your budget and Scope of Work.
USTAR receives an annual appropriation. Therefore, funding for TAP is dependent on USTAR’s appropriation. There is no minimum/maximum or suggested amount. Budgets and proposals should be driven by the cost associated with the milestones. However, USTAR puts a cap on compensation of project personnel not to exceed $150,000 per person per year.
An independent panel of technical and commercialization experts in the corresponding USTAR technology sectors review TAP proposals on a volunteer basis. The review process is managed from USTAR headquarters in Salt Lake City. Reviewers sign confidentiality disclosure agreements with USTAR and are prescreened to avoid conflicts of interest with applicants. USTAR strongly encourages, for your own protection, to not disclose confidential material in the application. An initial screen will be conducted by USTAR staff to ensure proposals meet submission requirements.
Peer review panels will review proposals based on the following criteria:
- Technical merit
- Strength and maturity of company and management and governance structure
- Potential for economic impact, as measured by:
- Job creation
- Product sales
- Potential revenue due to expansion of current business or development of new businesses
- And projected time to revenue or job creation
- Market need
- Technical capacity of team
- Reasonableness of cost proposal (size and allocation of budget is appropriate for the work proposed and matching funds available)
- Reasonableness of proposed milestones and timelines
- Any other factor indicative of applicant’s ability to produce measurable and timely impacts on the state in areas related to the economic development performance metrics used to evaluate USTAR activities.
SCORING RUBRIC FOR TAP – the scoring range is 1-5, in whole numbers. Reviewers scores are averaged and compiled into a rank order.
Technology Evaluation – (from the Project Narrative)
Score 5 on Technical Merit
- Milestones are specific, measurable, actionable and aligned with overall project objective
- The aggregate of milestones drives the commercial goals
- Technical description is detailed and provides alternative strategies to address unexpected outcomes
- Research timeline is adequate relative to project goals
Score 3 on Technical Merit
- Milestones are vague yet remain aligned with overall project objective
- The aggregate of milestones somewhat drives the commercial goals
- Technical description is detailed and but misses alternative strategies
- Research timeline not realistic relative to project goals
Score 1 on Technical Merit
- Milestones are not specific, measurable, actionable or aligned with overall project objective
- The aggregate of milestones does not support commercial goals
- Technical description is not detailed and is missing alternative strategies
- Research timeline fails to support project goals
Possible Economic Impact Evaluation – (from the Project Narrative)
Score 5 on Economic Impact
- Company plans to add permanent FTEs in the next 2-3 years
- Plan to leverage technology into sales, Federal grants, partnerships or risk capital investment in 2-3 years
Score 3 on Economic Impact
- Company plans to add permanent FTEs in the next 5-7 years
- Plan to leverage technology into sales, Federal grants, partnerships or risk capital investment in 5-7 years
Score 1 on Economic Impact
- Company does not provide a plan to add permanent FTEs
- Plan to leverage technology into sales, Federal grants, partnerships or risk capital investment is not addressed
Commercial Market Plan Evaluation – (from Project Narrative)
Score 5 of Commercial Market Evaluation
- Data driven discussion of business model; i.e., problem being solved, specific market, competition and competitive advantage
- IP strategy is provided
Score 3 of Commercial Market Evaluation
- Partial or qualitative data driven discussion of business model; i.e., problem being solved, specific market, competition and competitive advantage
- IP strategy is provided
Score 1 of Commercial Market Evaluation
- No discussion of business model; i.e., problem being solved, specific market, competition and competitive advantage
- IP strategy is provided
Management Team Capabilities Evaluation – (from Budget Justification and Biosketches)
Score 5 of Management Team Evaluation
- History of success marketing like technologies in this sector
- Experience in marketing and scaling like technologies in this sector
- Active governance structure and Board appropriate for stage of company
Score 3 of Management Team Evaluation
- History of success marketing technologies in other sectors
- Experience in marketing and scaling technologies in other sectors
- Planned governance structure and Board appropriate for company and in progress
Score 1 of Management Team Evaluation
- No experience marketing technologies
- No experience in marketing and scaling technologies
- Governance structure and Board inappropriate for TRL or not addressed
Technical Team Capabilities Evaluation – (from Budget Justification and Biosketches)
Score 5 Technical Team Evaluation
- Qualified background and experience to drive project, overcome delays and complete project as described
- Allocation of effort by senior and junior staff to the project is appropriate
- Team experienced in maneuvering a technology toward a commercial product
- Breadth of skill set among team members to bring toward commercialization
Score 3 Technical Team Evaluation
- Not all members have background and experience to drive project, overcome delays and complete project as described
- Allocation of effort by senior and junior staff to the project is modest
- Partial experience in maneuvering a technology toward a commercial product
- Limited skill set within team required for commercialization
Score 1 Technical Team Evaluation
- Few or no members have background and experience to drive project, overcome delays and complete project as described
- Allocation of effort by senior and junior staff to the project may put the project at risk
- No experience in maneuvering a technology toward a commercial product
- Team lacks skill set required for commercialization
Budget Evaluation – (from Budget pages and Budget Justification)
Score 5 of Budget Evaluation
- Proposed budget is realistic for the project and its milestones
- Expertise and % effort of salaried professionals consistent with the milestone
- Non-salary expenses sufficient to support project without padding
Score 3 of Budget Evaluation
- Proposed budget is somewhat over or under budgeted for the project and its milestones
- Expertise and % effort of salaried professionals is not adequate for the milestone
- Non-salary expenses of project are inappropriate
Score 1 of Budget Evaluation
- Proposed budget is not realistic for the project and its milestones
- Expertise and % effort of salaried professionals is not realistic for the milestones
- Non-salary expenses of project are inappropriate
USTAR has the discretion to determine the maximum amount of grant funding awarded based on available funds and quality of applicant pool. Upon award of the TAP grant, and prior to any disbursement of funds, the company must enter into a written agreement with USTAR governing the use of grant funding. Unless addressed in the terms and conditions of the written agreement between company and USTAR, the following provisions shall apply:
- Company must remain a Utah-based company for at least five years from initial disbursement of TAP funding
- Company may not use TAP grant funding to provide a primary benefit to any state other than Utah
- For all other eligibility requirements, company must maintain eligibility status for the TAP program until the project is complete, all milestones have been met, final disbursement of funding has been made, and first year reporting has been completed
- Funding will be contingent on successful completion of milestones and availability of appropriated funds. 50% of the FY milestone amounts will be given up front with the remaining amount to be disbursed upon milestone completion and verification of deliverable
A company that violates the requirements above forfeits the grant funding and may be required to repay all or a portion of funds received as part of the TAP grant.
Awardees will be contractually obligated to report to USTAR or affiliated auditors/contractors regarding jobs created and salary ranges, follow on investment, revenue, sales and other information as outlined in the Technology Acceleration Program administrative rules, terms and conditions of contract for a minimum of five years following completion of award.
Prior to disbursement of funds, awardees may be required to demonstrate that they are properly authorized to operate in the State of Utah (LLC, S-Corp, C-Corp, etc.). Awardees will be required to meet program milestones and to meet regularly with USTAR staff to assess progress on milestones.
If the company moves out of Utah or is acquired in 5 years, awardee may be required to pay the state back as stated in the TAP terms and conditions.
Schedule of disbursement of funds will be defined in the contract. Awards will be for no more than 18 months.
USTAR anticipates announcing selected proposals within 45 days of the closing date, and contracts will be given within 45 days following announcements.
Questions regarding TAP must be submitted in writing via email to TAPinfo@utah.gov . Inquiries made via any other method will not be accepted. In the interest of assuring fairness, all frequently asked questions and answers will be posted under TAP Questions on the USTAR website. Applicants with specific questions regarding any aspect of their application must be received no less than 24 hours before the close of the application deadline.